No learning curve, simply select the print driver, choose the separation settings you need and print perfect film separations.
Simply choose our universal “AccuRIP Emerald” printer driver in the print window.
All the info is there.AccuRIP™ Emerald software is the latest film printing RIP from Freehand engineered to deliver professional films used for the screen exposure process!ĪccuRIP™ software is your go-to solution for printing great films from Adobe, Corel, Sep Studio NXT and other mainstream graphics applications.
Take a look at Keith Cooper's full review. Ia basically uses the same ink set as the PRO-1
The Pro 1000 basically prints as good as the Pro 1 as well as the Pro 10 other than the fact that it uses both the pk and mk inks together. Pro-100, I wasn't inquiring about Pro-1 or Pro-10, I was inquiring about Pro-1000.
It is now a pire specialty printerĪnd when you talk about Pro-1 vs. It meas it is not loaded with color inks but with gloss optimizer alone!!! Jon cone does e same thing to overcoat pigment prints done on flossy and luster paper. Joe, I am afraid I am not able to follow you When you say 1400 is gloss optimizer printer what do you mean? The only difference in the pro-1 is two extra shades of gray! The PRO-10 did not get blow out of the water by the PRO-100 as originally thought. The PRO-1 prints just a bright and saturated and glossy a print as the PRO-100. Just like Jon CONE does for his Piezography prints done on Glossy or Luster papers! I use a rip to allow me to print an extremely even coat of GLOP from all 6 channels! I am using an EPSON 1400 loaded with nothing but Gloss Optimizer CISS so I can overcoat prints that need Bronzing or Gloss differential rescuing!Īnd that is almost everything printer with pigment, even OEM on Glossy and Luster media! The Canon Pro-100 dye-based printer is now the better choice over the Epson Claria dye based printers due to a more stable black ink, and of course, the extra photo grey channels in the Canon Pro-100 that the Epson Claria printers don't have. No gloss optimizer in that set because none needed with Claria dyes. The Epson Stylus Photo 1400? It's a Claria dye-based printer, succeeded now by the Epson 1430 model, with both former and later models using same Claria dye set. Pro-1000? I think lots of people would be interested, not just me. Do you think you could do similar comparison between say P800 vs. Thank you Joe that was very valuable, informative and intriguing! I see you have tons of printers and that you might be having P800 and Pro-1000 too. Watch my video and be prepared to be shocked! Would be very valuable, please Thank you!ĭepends on what pigment printer you are talking about. Have experience with Canon Pro-100 and/or Epson 1430 printing headshotsĤ.
pigment when it comes to printing headshotsģ. So I started wondering would I get that out of dye inks, would I be better off with Canon Pro-100 or Epson 1430.ġ. I don't know what the right word would be. They don't look bad but I feel headshots would need bit more of. I've managed to take a looked at samples printed with pigment inks (mainly Epson 3880) and honestly I was not impressed by them. I am guessing I would be mainly printing on luster or glossy photo papers. Goal is not the permanence but to achieve maximum "attractiveness" of those prints when viewed, and obviously I don't need bigger than 13" printer. I am new to printing and am in need of printer I would use for actor/model portfolio headshots I am taking.